HANFORD, Calif. Residents filled the Hanford City Council meeting Tuesday night, voicing concerns over two issues that have generated increasing public attention: the city’s use of Flock Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras and the possibility of future data centers within the city’s jurisdiction.

During public comment, speaker after speaker addressed the council, raising questions about privacy, government transparency, and the potential long-term impact of expanding surveillance technology and attracting large-scale data center projects.

The public comments reflected growing concern among residents who said they want greater accountability from elected officials before additional technology or development moves forward.

Several residents focused on the potential environmental effects of data centers, particularly their use of water and electricity. Kathleen Jorgensen urged local city councils and the Kings County Board of Supervisors to work together and form a coalition addressing data center development. She questioned whether fluids used by the facilities could eventually affect the region’s groundwater or air.

“We have a lack of water,” Jorgensen told the council. “Please help us.”

Another Hanford resident, Alexandra, said the issue extends beyond political affiliations and should instead be viewed as a question of protecting community resources. She expressed concern that residents are already being asked to conserve water while facing increases in water and electricity costs.

“This is not about politics, what side you’re on,” she said. “This is about humanity, about our resources.”

Cesar Caratacha, a Hanford resident and father of a six-year-old daughter, said he attended the meeting because he was concerned about how future data center development could affect younger generations.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think it’s important for me to use my voice,” Caratacha said, adding that he wanted city leaders to consider potential impacts on air quality and the future his daughter will inherit.

Other speakers raised concerns about constant noise from cooling equipment and backup generators, potential pressure on the electrical grid, agricultural impacts, and whether large data centers would create enough permanent local jobs to justify their consumption of community resources.

ADVERTISEMENT

One resident played a brief recording described as the sound of a data center, calling it a high-pitched metallic noise. Residents questioned what it could mean for nearby homes if similar noise continued around the clock.

Several speakers also discussed the Flock camera system. They said residents were not given a meaningful opportunity to publicly discuss the cameras before they were installed and called for more information about how the system operates, who can access the data, how long information is retained, and whether it can be shared beyond local law enforcement.

One speaker described the system as more than a collection of individual cameras, arguing that a connected network could create a searchable record of people’s movements, associations, and activities.

Another resident said the cameras should remain limited to their original public safety purpose and that local data should remain under the control of the Hanford Police Department, not private companies, outside organizations, or agencies beyond the community.

At the conclusion of public comment, Councilman Travis Paden asked Mayor Mark Kairis whether future agenda items could be moved to immediately follow public comment during council meetings. The council reached a consensus to make that procedural change moving forward.

Paden also requested future study sessions on both the city’s Flock camera system and the issue of data centers. The council reached a consensus to place both topics on a future agenda for discussion.

While that announcement was welcomed by some in attendance, it also raised new questions that remain unanswered.

The biggest question is timing.

Will the study sessions take place before voters head to the polls, or after the election? Will they be scheduled for the next City Council meeting, or weeks or even months from now? As Tuesday night’s meeting concluded, no date had been announced.

The timing could become an important political issue. Councilman Paden is currently seeking re-election to the Hanford City Council, and as of publication, no candidate has officially filed to run against him.

Residents who attended the meeting made it clear they intend to closely watch what happens next.

Beyond the study sessions themselves, many are asking larger policy questions.

Will the City Council support adopting a policy that would prohibit data centers within the City of Hanford?

Will council members consider suspending the city’s Flock camera system while privacy concerns are further examined?

Those questions remain unanswered.

Several speakers expressed skepticism, pointing to previous council decisions involving water and refuse rate increases, where they believe the council’s actions differed from earlier public expectations.

Whether those concerns prove warranted will depend on what follows.

For now, the council has agreed to hold study sessions on both topics, but residents are still waiting to learn when those discussions will take place and what actions, if any, the council will ultimately consider.

With the election season underway, the timing of those discussions, and the positions council members ultimately take on surveillance technology and future data center policies, could become important issues for Hanford voters in the months ahead.

For now, residents will be watching.

Follow Kings Network News for More Coverage

For additional videos, interviews, and behind the scenes coverage from the Hanford City Council meeting, follow us on TikTok at @TalkKNN.

Stay informed with the latest local news, breaking updates, and community coverage from across Kings County.

@talkknn